Canada Will Legalize Medically Assisted Dying (MAiD) For Drug Addicts     

Canada will legalize medically assisted dying (MAID) for individuals addicted to drugs starting next spring, allowing access to those whose sole medical condition is a mental illness, which includes substance use disorders.

This expansion of the MAiD law, previously in effect since 2016, has sparked controversy and concerns among some drug users and harm reduction advocates.

The contentious move is part of a broader cultural shift in the Canadian healthcare system, emphasizing principles of diversity, equity, and inclusion.

It raises questions about the ethics and implications of providing MAiD to those with substance use disorders. Some critics argue that alternative measures, such as improved access to overdose prevention sites, opioid agonist medications, housing, and employment, should take precedence over expanding MAiD.

While proponents of the expansion, like Dr. David Martell, argue that people with substance use disorders should not be excluded from MA8D eligibility based on their mental disorder, others believe that the focus should be on enhancing support and healthcare options for this group. Martell, who provides MAiD, expressed that he hasn’t encountered a strong desire for assisted death among his patients with substance use disorders.

The criteria for MAiD eligibility in such cases may involve assessing the individual’s motivation for the request, the duration and nature of their treatment, and the nature of their mental condition. 

There is recognition that there is no one-size-fits-all answer to addiction treatment, and guidelines are currently limited. Opioid agonist therapy, using medications like methadone or buprenorphine, is considered a standard treatment for opioid addiction but faces accessibility issues in many areas of Canada.

As the expansion of MAiD approaches, provinces will need to develop their own protocols for assessing individuals with substance use disorders. Experts like Dr. Simon Colgan emphasize the importance of understanding these requests in the context of a person’s lived experience, highlighting the need for input from those with firsthand experiences. 

Critics, however, argue that the government’s focus should be on addressing social determinants of health, such as housing and income, before facilitating access to MAiD.

While there are concerns about a potential influx of MAiD assessments, Dr. Martell expects the number of qualifying individuals to be relatively low when assessed correctly.

Source: Vice 

PS: In a related post published yesterday, Liberals voted against Bill C-314 which seeks to prevent mental illness as the sole condition for receiving MAiD.

Sign up to join the conversation
0 Replies
Inline Feedbacks
View all replies